Find link

language:

Find link is a tool written by Edward Betts.

Longer titles found: Graduated majority judgment (view)

searching for Majority judgment 201 found (323 total)

List of judgments of the Constitutional Court of South Africa delivered in 1995 (143 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Interim Constitution despite a clause appearing to exclude them. Majority judgment by Mahomed (Langa, Madala, Mokgoro and O'Regan concurring); separate

Volks v Robinson (1,494 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

decision in South African family law and law of succession. In a majority judgment written by Justice Thembile Skweyiya, the Constitutional Court of

President v M&G Media (824 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

on 29 November 2011. Jeremy Gauntlett represented M&G. The court's majority judgment was written by Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo and joined by Justices

National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Justice (3,357 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

The decision was handed down on 9 October of the same year; the majority judgment was authored by Justice Ackermann, while Justice Sachs wrote a separate

Peter Warburton (judge) (277 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

As a Justice he was one of those who supported Sir Edward Coke's majority judgment in Dr. Bonham's Case, and he discharged his duties as "an ancient

New South Wales v Commonwealth (2006) (2,304 words) [view diff] no match in snippet view article

New South Wales v Commonwealth (also called the WorkChoices case) is a landmark decision of the High Court of Australia, which held that the federal government's

Canada Trustco Mortgage Co v Canada (1,175 words) [view diff] no match in snippet view article find links to article

Canada Trustco Mortgage Co v Canada, is a significant case of the Supreme Court of Canada on the intersection of the Income Tax Act and the Bills of Exchange

Mogoeng Mogoeng (4,965 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

high-profile litigation in Helen Suzman Foundation v President. His majority judgment struck down several sections of the South African Police Service Amendment

Rated voting (1,597 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

A majority judgment ballot is based on grades like those used in schools.

Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (3,287 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

advocacy which seems to have had the greatest impact". The joint majority judgment of Knox CJ, Isaacs, Rich & Starke JJ was delivered by Isaacs J and

Interactive representation (618 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Hardy Cross Dillard (1,578 words) [view diff] case mismatch in snippet view article find links to article

Iceland [11] Archived 2017-10-13 at the Wayback Machine United Kingdom Majority Judgment on merits [12] Archived 2017-10-25 at the Wayback Machine Separate

Double simultaneous vote (280 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Bradley W. Miller (494 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

also opposed same-sex marriage as of that date. Miller wrote the majority judgment in Toronto (City) v Ontario (Attorney General) when it came before

Edwin Cameron (4,345 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

defamation law and free speech: In The Citizen v McBride, Cameron's majority judgment enlarged the scope of the fair comment defence and substantially excused

Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly (2017) (1,491 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

obligation to hold the President accountable for his conduct. In a majority judgment written by Justice Chris Jafta, the court ordered the National Assembly

Doctors for Life v Speaker (2,063 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

on the merits of the application. Justice Sandile Ngcobo wrote the majority judgment, a lengthy judgment that drew heavily on the principle of participatory

Huntington–Hill method (893 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Saudi Arabia v. Nelson (977 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

“based upon a commercial activity”, but nonetheless concur with the majority judgment because the commercial acts did not occur in the US. Justice Kennedy

Mabo v Queensland (No 1) (656 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

which are held only by a certain group falls under section 10(1). The majority judgment of Justices Brennan, Toohey and Gaudron found that native title rights

Social psychology (7,026 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

the trials, participants conformed to the majority, even though the majority judgment was clearly wrong. Seventy-five percent of the participants conformed

Thint v NDPP (1,613 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

mentioned the Judicial Service Commission complaint briefly in his majority judgment. This revelation launched a 15-year-long controversy and resulted

South African Police Service v Barnard (1,322 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

considered the constitutionality of employment equity measures. In a majority judgment written by Justice Dikgang Moseneke, the court upheld as lawful a

House v The King (736 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

the High Court on the ground that the sentence was excessive. The majority judgment of Dixon, Evatt, and McTiernan JJ began with a brief recitation of

General ticket (738 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Oklahoma primary electoral system (1,033 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

National remnant (868 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v SARIPA (1,310 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

the Master of the High Court. Justice Chris Jafta wrote the court's majority judgment and a three-person minority joined a dissent written by Justice Mbuyiseli

Judgment (law) (7,618 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

concurring, plurality, and dissenting opinions. Only the opinion of the majority judgment is considered to have precedent-setting weight. Some examples of opinions

S v M (2,150 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

right to family care or appropriate alternative care. The court's majority judgment was written by Justice Albie Sachs, and the full bench agreed with

Kate O'Regan (2,641 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

female judges on the Court for its first 13 years. O'Regan's first majority judgment was S v Bhulwana; S v Gwadiso, where the Court for the first time

Edwards v Canada (AG) (2,868 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

1928. Francis Alexander Anglin, Chief Justice of Canada, wrote the majority judgment, with Lamont J. and Smith J. concurring. Mignault J. and Duff J. wrote

Binomial voting system (1,155 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Minister of Finance v Van Heerden (2,329 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

affirmative action clause in section 9(2) of the Bill of Rights. In a majority judgment written by Justice Dikgang Moseneke, the court held that section 9(2)

President v Hugo (1,353 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

November 1996 and decided on 18 April 1997. The Constitutional Court's majority judgment was written by Justice Richard Goldstone, who overturned the Supreme

Voting (3,766 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Majority bonus system (1,110 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland (881 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

High Court but was successful in part in the Supreme Court. In a majority judgment delivered in Crotty v. An Taoiseach, the Court held that Title III

Bwanya v Master of the High Court (2,590 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

the Constitutional Court of South Africa on 31 December 2021 with a majority judgment written by Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga. A majority of the court upheld

Section 51(xxxi) of the Australian Constitution (1,491 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

acquisition of a proprietary right. In Commonwealth v Yunupingu (2025), the majority judgment of the High Court cited the Bank Nationalisation case when confirming

Anti-plurality voting (388 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Mbuyiseli Madlanga (1,217 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

abrogated the action for adultery. Madlanga was one of the authors of the majority judgment in the 2015 My Vote Counts v Speaker, which was widely condemned.

Phillips v Director of Public Prosecutions (1,303 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

establishments". Justices Ngcobo and Sachs, both of whom concurred in the majority judgment, also wrote separately to raise certain qualifications. Ngcobo had

Persona designata (2,071 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

the Northern Territory or any of the State Supreme Courts. In their majority judgment, Chief Justice Gibbs and Justices Wilson and Dawson acknowledged the

K. S. Hegde (657 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

State of Kerala. However, he resigned soon after delivering the majority judgment, as Justice A. N. Ray was appointed the Chief Justice of India, although

Dictatorship mechanism (483 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Panachage (1,209 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Khosa v Minister of Social Development (917 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

represented by Paul Kennedy SC and the Legal Resources Centre. In a majority judgment written by Justice Yvonne Mokgoro, the Constitutional Court upheld

My Vote Counts v Speaker of the National Assembly (1,149 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

2017). "Botching procedure, avoiding substance: a critique of the majority judgment in My Vote Counts". South African Journal on Human Rights. 33 (1):

Masterpiece Inc. v. Alavida Lifestyles Inc. (1,388 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

expected source of wares or services." Rothstein J. delivering the majority judgment of the Court held that Alavida's proposed trade-mark "Masterpiece

Vinitaly (738 words) [view diff] case mismatch in snippet view article find links to article

Books (May 5, 2009) ISBN 0156033267 M. L. Balinski, Rida Laraki "Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing" pg 152, MIT Press, 2010 Claudia

Jacob Zuma contempt of court (4,610 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

sentenced Zuma to 15 months' imprisonment for contempt of court. The majority judgment was written by Acting Deputy Chief Justice Sisi Khampepe, who held

Independence of irrelevant alternatives (1,991 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

JSTOR 2297002. Retrieved 2024-09-25. Balinski, M. L.; Laraki, Rida (2010). Majority judgment: measuring, ranking, and electing. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262545716

Competition Commission v Mediclinic Southern Africa (993 words) [view diff] no match in snippet view article find links to article

Competition Commission of South Africa v Mediclinic Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another is an important decision in South African competition law. It

Independence of irrelevant alternatives (1,991 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

JSTOR 2297002. Retrieved 2024-09-25. Balinski, M. L.; Laraki, Rida (2010). Majority judgment: measuring, ranking, and electing. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262545716

Random ballot (1,700 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Kruger v President of the Republic of South Africa (2,017 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

J, Mokgoro J, Ngcobo J, Nkabinde J, Skweyiya J (who composed the majority judgment), Van Der Westhuizen J, Yacoob J, Jafta AJ and Kroon AJ. Counsel for

My Vote Counts v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services (1,049 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

matter was heard on 13 March 2018 and decided on 21 June 2018, with a majority judgment written by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng. In the 2015 matter of My

S v Jordan (982 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

brothel-keeping and prostitution. It was handed down on 9 October 2002 with a majority judgment by Justice Sandile Ngcobo. Hearing a challenge to provisions of the

Single-member district (1,113 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Countback (821 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

John Brightman, Baron Brightman (660 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

test of intent required for a conviction of murder; and joined the majority judgment that refused to grant the government an order banning on newspaper

Ian Binnie (2,805 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Sinclair, 2010 SCC 35 in favour of an accused on the basis that the majority judgment too narrowly restricted the right of the accused to counsel under

Eldad Mwangusya (318 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Court). At the Constitutional Court, Mwangusya wrote the court's Majority judgment "that struck down the Anti-homosexuality Act on grounds that it was

Leveling seat (2,247 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Arena Holdings v South African Revenue Service (660 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

five-to-four on the constitutional question. Justice Jody Kollapen wrote the majority judgment and Justice Nonkosi Mhlantla wrote a dissenting opinion. In early

Prince v Law Society (1,559 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Justice) and Justice O'Regan were absent. The Constitutional Court's majority judgment was co written by Chief Justice Chaskalson and Justices Ackermann

Intergovernmental immunity (Australia) (2,110 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

the States and State laws could bind the Commonwealth. However the majority judgment, commonly attributed to Isaacs J, noted that different considerations

Allied Concrete Ltd v Meltzer (900 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

payment, or may precede it". McGrath, Glazebrook and Arnold JJ gave the majority judgment and Elias CJ and William Young J concurred in separate judgments.

Block voting (1,424 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Masetlha v President (1,459 words) [view diff] no match in snippet view article find links to article

Masetlha v President of the Republic of South Africa and Another is an important decision in the Constitutional Court of South Africa which held that procedural

Leisure Employment Services Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs (304 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

The Court of Appeal eventually dismissed the employer's appeal. The majority judgment held that under r 31(1)(i) any deduction 'in respect of the provision

Third party (U.S. politics) (4,888 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Quota Borda system (341 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Pao On v Lau Yiu Long (1,107 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Wilberforce and Lord Simon of Glaisdale - observations with which the majority judgment appears to be in agreement. In determining whether there was a coercion

Semi-proportional representation (1,492 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Mechanisms of the English common law (992 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

time, more attention is given to the dissenting judgment that to the majority judgment. Scottish decisions (and decisions from the USA and common law jurisdictions

Direct representation (1,516 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Condorcet paradox (3,468 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Harksen v Lane (2,034 words) [view diff] no match in snippet view article find links to article

Harksen v Lane NO and Others is an important decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, delivered on 7 October 1997. The court dismissed a challenge

Page v Smith (663 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

defendant was found liable for the nervous shock suffered by Mr Page. The majority judgment has been critically received by most academics. The minority followed

Nonpartisan primary (4,212 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Mal Brough (1,741 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Ashby affair". Sunshine Coast Daily. Retrieved 22 September 2015. The majority judgment of the Full Federal Court stated that there was insufficient evidence

Additional-member system (2,952 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Primary election (7,672 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Sardar Sarovar Dam (2,826 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

from the initial 80 m (260 ft). In October 2000 again, in a 2-to-1 majority judgment in the Supreme Court, the government was allowed to construct the

New Nation Movement NPC v President of the Republic of South Africa (3,515 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

months to allow Parliament to modify the electoral laws to comply. The majority judgment was written by Justice Madlanga and a concurring opinion was written

R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (8,699 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

Wales or the Northern Ireland Assembly to trigger article 50. The majority judgment said the following. 51. ... ministers cannot frustrate the purpose

2007 French presidential election (10,626 words) [view diff] case mismatch in snippet view article find links to article

Dolez, Bernard; Grofman, Bernard; Laurent, Annie (eds.), "Election by Majority Judgment: Experimental Evidence", In Situ and Laboratory Experiments on Electoral

Symmetry (social choice) (497 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Political fragmentation (637 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Mandisa Maya (3,288 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

2012. In the latter capacity, she wrote the Constitutional Court's majority judgment in Competition Commission v Loungefoam and Others. She was also the

R v Grant (1,208 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

firearm from one place to another met the definition of "transfer". The majority judgment was given by McLachlin CJ and Charron J. The majority found that "detention"

Charles Bowen, Baron Bowen (1,751 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

who performed its terms. Vagliano v Bank of England - prepared the majority judgment of the court, held wrong in conclusion by the majority of the House

Harvela Investments Ltd v Royal Trust of Canada (CI) Ltd (748 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

v. Korea Tungsten Mining Co. Ltd. (1982) 449 N.Y.S. 2d 173. The majority judgment, at pp. 174-175, succinctly and cogently summarised the reasons for

May's theorem (659 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Phragmen's voting rules (3,361 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Matrix vote (294 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Sandile Ngcobo (2,711 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

conservative judge, and his critics accused him of executive bias. His majority judgment in S v Jordan, on the criminalisation of prostitution, was unpopular

Arbitration (8,954 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Arbitration Blog. Retrieved 1 October 2023. The expression appears in the majority judgment in the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Wilko v Swan 346 US 427 (1953)

Zipper system (1,197 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

R v JA (1,104 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

requires an active mind during the sexual activity in question. The majority judgment was given by Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin. The majority reviewed

Judicial independence (5,502 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

to life and liberty under Article 21 has been suspended? In a 4:1 majority judgment, the Supreme Court held that no person had the right to seek a writ

R v Collins (1987) (959 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

the requirements of s. 10 were not met, the search was illegal. The majority judgment was given by Lamer J. Lamer began by examining if the search violated

R v Harrison (1,070 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

criticized the decision as a significant weakening of the Charter. The majority judgment was written by McLachlin C.J. The majority applied the new test for

Mixed electoral system (2,803 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867 (3,866 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

oil as a form of regulating inter-provincial trade. As noted in the majority judgment by Pigeon J.: It is clear, therefore, that the existence and extent

Re Judiciary and Navigation Acts (279 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

not issue legal opinions unattached to a specific case. The joint majority judgment stated: But we can find nothing in Chapter III of the Constitution

Walking subcaucus (1,079 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd (2,729 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Justices Gummow, Hayne, Heydon and Crennan) joined in the leading majority judgment allowing the ACCC's appeal. The joint judgment reasoned that Parliament

Le Roux v Dey (1,581 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

overlapping lines. The justices filed four separate judgments: a majority judgment by Acting Justice Fritz Brand, joined by five other justices; a minority

List of judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom delivered in 2016 (261 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Justice of England and Wales, also sat on this case. He supported the majority judgment. Lord Dyson, the Master of the Rolls, also sat on this case and agreed

Proportional representation (17,261 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Northern Territory v Mengel (664 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

government's appeal and increased the damages to $425,125 plus interest. The majority judgment was that of Mason CJ, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron & McHugh JJ, holding

Conformity (8,255 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

matches the first line, A, B, or C? In the Asch conformity experiments, people frequently followed the majority judgment, even when the majority was wrong.

Gregory v. Ashcroft (801 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

and South Carolina v. Baker (1988). The concurrence agreed with the majority judgment because it found that the state judges were not included in the ADEA's

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud (23,469 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Nariman (who were both part of the original bench that passed the majority judgment) dissented and held that the parameters for the exercise of the review

Smith set (2,324 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Top-four primary (4,317 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Abortion in Canada (8,777 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

reasonable justification for an infringement. There was no single majority judgment. Chief Justice Dickson, Justice Beetz, and Justice Wilson all wrote

John Hlophe (7,522 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

pricing regulations newly promulgated by the Minister of Health. The majority judgment was written by Judge James Yekiso, joined by Hlophe, and opposed in

Zweitmandat (599 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Quota rule (981 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

List of judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom delivered in 2013 (482 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Clerk, Lord Carloway, also sat on this case. He concurred with the majority judgment. A diminished panel of three justices heard this case. The Master

List of judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom delivered in 2015 (377 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

the Rolls, Lord Dyson, also sat on this case. He concurred with the majority judgment of Lord Hughes. Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, also sat on this

Therapeutic abortion committee (1,304 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Although there was no single majority judgment, the three judgments finding the provisions unconstitutional concluded

Batch summability (1,258 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Winner-take-all system (1,475 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke (1,166 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Lardner-Burke, did not participate in the appeal. Lord Reid gave the majority judgment of the Judicial Committee. He held that the 1965 Emergency Regulations

Veto Players (680 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Median voter theorem (3,936 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Michael Somare (7,636 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

he was suspended from office for two weeks without pay. That was a majority judgment of two judges. Judge Sir Robin Auld dissented. He was the only Judge

United States v. The Amistad (7,230 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Joseph Story gave the Supreme Court's majority judgment on 9 March 1841.

Proportionality for solid coalitions (967 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Australian constitutional law (10,363 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

mainland Territories, as well as certain trade unions. The single majority judgment, while it did not expressly adopt, waved aside all the objections

Du Plessis v De Klerk (5,174 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Constitution both to pre-constitutional conduct and to private disputes. The majority judgment was written by Acting Justice Sydney Kentridge and the leading dissent

2016 Indian banknote demonetisation (11,314 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Retrieved 2 January 2023. "Demonetisation is valid, says SC in 4:1 majority judgment; Justice Nagarathna dissents". The Hindu. 2 January 2023. Retrieved

Pius Langa (4,537 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Justice, as the hub of the administration of the courts. Langa's first majority judgment in the Constitutional Court was S v Williams, a 1995 matter which

Wasted vote (3,901 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Wasted vote (3,901 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Multiwinner voting (2,785 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

R v Wanhalla (839 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

a miscarriage of justice". President William Young delivered the majority judgment which included a model set of jury directions the Court was "inclined

Ndlovu v Ngcobo (1,183 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

not be restricted to persons who took occupation unlawfully. In a majority judgment, Harms JA held that, by the very nature of things, a mortgagor, being

Democratic Alliance v President (961 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

the Supreme Court's order of unconstitutionality. However, in the majority judgment written by Acting Deputy Chief Justice Zak Yacoob, the court diverged

Tournament solution (572 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Fraser v HM Advocate (1,231 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

for special leave to appeal. Lord Hope of Craighead delivered the majority judgment. Reaffirming that the High Court remained the final court of appeal

Implicit utilitarian voting (349 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

D21 – Janeček method (1,838 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (2,333 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Supreme Court. The appeal was allowed, with Lord Reed giving the majority judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Hodge agreed. Lord Mance and Lord Hughes

Motion and amendment (572 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Quadratic voting (3,434 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

McKelvey–Schofield chaos theorem (778 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Mahomed v R (1,467 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Appeal as part of the narrative, did fall squarely with s 40(1)." The majority judgment given by Justice Andrew Tipping began by noting that "The greater

Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya (3,356 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

international law. Lawyers at Norton Rose Fulbright opined that "[t]he majority judgment … sends a strong signal to the Canadian business community that consideration

Bryson v Three Foot Six Ltd (1,422 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

nature of the arrangement by the three traditional tests which, the majority judgment said, left little scope for significant weight to be placed on contractual

Vote-ratio monotonicity (748 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Alonso de Salazar Frías (2,584 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

interrogation under torture in order to provide more proof. In the event, the majority judgment prevailed, and those who denied their guilt were burned either alive

Plurality-rule family (122 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

R v Suberu (1,610 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

questions to determine whether further detention is necessary. The majority judgment was given by McLachlin C.J. and Charron J. The majority followed the

Blundell v Vardon (3,601 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

O'Loghlin by the Houses of Parliament of South Australia was void. The majority judgment of Griffith CJ, Barton and Higgins JJ held that section 7 of the Constitution

Fractional social choice (1,658 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Maximal lotteries (1,281 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Entertainment Software Ass'n v Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (1,609 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

s. 3(1)(f) of the Act. Justices Abella and Moldaver delivered the majority judgment of the Court in a five to four decision. The Court held that the download

March v Stramare (E & MH) Pty Ltd (2,002 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

the full court of the Supreme Court of South Australia in 1989. The majority judgment consisting of Chief Justice Mason, Justices Deane, Toohey and Gaudron

Block approval voting (350 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Multiwinner approval voting (2,632 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Coexistence (electoral systems) (220 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Canada (Attorney General) v. Power (511 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

and the Westminster system at Carleton University, wrote that the majority judgment in Power was "all rather disconcerting" and "went against rulings

Alley v Gillespie (1,491 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

the Court of Disputed Returns. Three judgments were delivered: the majority judgment of Kiefel CJ, Bell, Edelman and Keane JJ, and two separate judgments

Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd (3,497 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

consisting of Lord Denning MR, Edmund-Davies LJ and Lawton LJ delivered a majority judgment (Edmund-Davies LJ dissenting), that the Spartan Steel could only recover

Corruption Watch v President (1,473 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

sections 12(4) and 12(6) of the NPA Act were unconstitutional. In a majority judgment written by Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, the court held that those provisions

Fox v Percy (1,561 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

The High Court decided unanimously for the respondent, Percy. The majority judgment discussed at length legal principles behind the appeal process; comments

Unrestricted domain (354 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Gronow v Gronow (2,258 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

given to the mother where she was otherwise satisfactory.: p 515 The majority judgment is that of Mason & Wilson JJ, with whom Aickin J relevantly agreed

Paulsen v Slip Knot (631 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

concurrence of Justices Chris Jafta and Bess Nkabinde; a concurring majority judgment, written by Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke and concurred in

South African family law (7,073 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

dignity. Handed down before the passage of the Civil Union Act, the majority judgment found that there had been no duty of support while the man had been

Solid coalition (411 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Toronto (City) v Ontario (Attorney General) (2,477 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

the size of the Toronto city council. Justice Bradley W. Miller's majority judgment concluded that the provisions reducing the number of wards during

Uber BV v Aslam (8,821 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

workers entitled to the minimum wage and paid holidays. The joint majority judgment said the following: 49. There is no dispute that Autoclenz puts paid

Mathematics of apportionment (5,366 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Electoral system of Hungary (4,190 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Storable votes (2,477 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

S v B (1,854 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

decision in S v Khumalo, where, Nicholas JA, in the course of his majority judgment, said, In the assessment of an appropriate sentence, regard must be

BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (2,679 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

to the application of the test in BP Refinery, holding that if the majority judgment had sought to derive the implication of a term from the matrix of

BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (2,679 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

to the application of the test in BP Refinery, holding that if the majority judgment had sought to derive the implication of a term from the matrix of

Deloitte & Touche v Livent Inc (Receiver of) (2,835 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

causation will be established. It appears from a consideration of the majority judgment that the approach to scope of duty in Canadian law is not identical

Justified representation (5,256 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Expanding approvals rule (628 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Law of evidence in South Africa (14,869 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

of the case, which went on appeal to the SCA. Cameron JA wrote the majority judgment and provided some pointers: The presiding officer is under a duty

Fractional approval voting (3,299 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Apparentment (370 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Localized list (540 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

South African law of agency (14,859 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

according to Richman Mqeke, since it is based on non-delegability. The majority judgment, written by Ponnan JA, disagreed with Nugent's for the same reason

Dumisani Zondi (1,511 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

African general election. In that capacity, in April 2024, he wrote the majority judgment in MK Party v Electoral Commission, in which the court ruled that

Majority jackpot system (940 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

SATAWU v Garvas (1,594 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Section 11 is therefore consistent with the Constitution. Mogoeng's majority judgment was joined by Acting Deputy Chief Justice Zak Yacoob, Acting Justice

List of Canadian appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, 1930–1939 (387 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

others [1934] UKPC 44 "This is an appeal by special leave from a majority judgment of the Supreme Court affirming the legality of a regulation of the

S v Masiya (7,630 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

sexual penetration of the anus of either a female or a male. In her majority judgment, Nkabinde J held that only non-consensual sexual penetration of a

Parliament House, New Delhi (3,039 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

received against the project in the court. The project was cleared in a majority judgment of the Supreme Court in January 2021, with riders for environmental

Spoiler effect (5,050 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest

Multi-issue voting (6,376 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Antiplurality (el. Coombs) Cardinal voting Score voting Approval voting Majority judgment STAR voting Proportional representation Party-list Apportionment Highest