Find link

language: af: Afrikaans als: Alemannisch [Alemannic] am: አማርኛ [Amharic] an: aragonés [Aragonese] ar: العربية [Arabic] arz: مصرى [Egyptian Arabic] as: অসমীয়া [Assamese] ast: asturianu [Asturian] az: azərbaycanca [Azerbaijani] azb: تۆرکجه [Southern Azerbaijani] ba: башҡортса [Bashkir] bar: Boarisch [Bavarian] bat-smg: žemaitėška [Samogitian] be: беларуская [Belarusian] be-tarask: беларуская (тарашкевіца) [Belarusian (Taraškievica)] bg: български [Bulgarian] bn: বাংলা [Bengali] bpy: বিষ্ণুপ্রিয়া মণিপুরী [Bishnupriya Manipuri] br: brezhoneg [Breton] bs: bosanski [Bosnian] bug: ᨅᨔ ᨕᨘᨁᨗ [Buginese] ca: català [Catalan] ce: нохчийн [Chechen] ceb: Cebuano ckb: کوردیی ناوەندی [Kurdish (Sorani)] cs: čeština [Czech] cv: Чӑвашла [Chuvash] cy: Cymraeg [Welsh] da: dansk [Danish] de: Deutsch [German] el: Ελληνικά [Greek] en: English eo: Esperanto es: español [Spanish] et: eesti [Estonian] eu: euskara [Basque] fa: فارسی [Persian] fi: suomi [Finnish] fo: føroyskt [Faroese] fr: français [French] fy: Frysk [West Frisian] ga: Gaeilge [Irish] gd: Gàidhlig [Scottish Gaelic] gl: galego [Galician] gu: ગુજરાતી [Gujarati] he: עברית [Hebrew] hi: हिन्दी [Hindi] hr: hrvatski [Croatian] hsb: hornjoserbsce [Upper Sorbian] ht: Kreyòl ayisyen [Haitian] hu: magyar [Hungarian] hy: Հայերեն [Armenian] ia: interlingua [Interlingua] id: Bahasa Indonesia [Indonesian] io: Ido is: íslenska [Icelandic] it: italiano [Italian] ja: 日本語 [Japanese] jv: Basa Jawa [Javanese] ka: ქართული [Georgian] kk: қазақша [Kazakh] kn: ಕನ್ನಡ [Kannada] ko: 한국어 [Korean] ku: Kurdî [Kurdish (Kurmanji)] ky: Кыргызча [Kirghiz] la: Latina [Latin] lb: Lëtzebuergesch [Luxembourgish] li: Limburgs [Limburgish] lmo: lumbaart [Lombard] lt: lietuvių [Lithuanian] lv: latviešu [Latvian] map-bms: Basa Banyumasan [Banyumasan] mg: Malagasy min: Baso Minangkabau [Minangkabau] mk: македонски [Macedonian] ml: മലയാളം [Malayalam] mn: монгол [Mongolian] mr: मराठी [Marathi] mrj: кырык мары [Hill Mari] ms: Bahasa Melayu [Malay] my: မြန်မာဘာသာ [Burmese] mzn: مازِرونی [Mazandarani] nah: Nāhuatl [Nahuatl] nap: Napulitano [Neapolitan] nds: Plattdüütsch [Low Saxon] ne: नेपाली [Nepali] new: नेपाल भाषा [Newar] nl: Nederlands [Dutch] nn: norsk nynorsk [Norwegian (Nynorsk)] no: norsk bokmål [Norwegian (Bokmål)] oc: occitan [Occitan] or: ଓଡ଼ିଆ [Oriya] os: Ирон [Ossetian] pa: ਪੰਜਾਬੀ [Eastern Punjabi] pl: polski [Polish] pms: Piemontèis [Piedmontese] pnb: پنجابی [Western Punjabi] pt: português [Portuguese] qu: Runa Simi [Quechua] ro: română [Romanian] ru: русский [Russian] sa: संस्कृतम् [Sanskrit] sah: саха тыла [Sakha] scn: sicilianu [Sicilian] sco: Scots sh: srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски [Serbo-Croatian] si: සිංහල [Sinhalese] simple: Simple English sk: slovenčina [Slovak] sl: slovenščina [Slovenian] sq: shqip [Albanian] sr: српски / srpski [Serbian] su: Basa Sunda [Sundanese] sv: svenska [Swedish] sw: Kiswahili [Swahili] ta: தமிழ் [Tamil] te: తెలుగు [Telugu] tg: тоҷикӣ [Tajik] th: ไทย [Thai] tl: Tagalog tr: Türkçe [Turkish] tt: татарча/tatarça [Tatar] uk: українська [Ukrainian] ur: اردو [Urdu] uz: oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча [Uzbek] vec: vèneto [Venetian] vi: Tiếng Việt [Vietnamese] vo: Volapük wa: walon [Walloon] war: Winaray [Waray] yi: ייִדיש [Yiddish] yo: Yorùbá [Yoruba] zh: 中文 [Chinese] zh-min-nan: Bân-lâm-gú [Min Nan] zh-yue: 粵語 [Cantonese]

jump to random article

Longer titles found: Bijection, injection and surjection (view)

searching for Bijection 195 found (675 total)

alternate case: bijection

Counting (2,130 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

is that no bijection can exist between {1, 2, ..., n} and {1, 2, ..., m} unless n = m; this fact (together with the fact that two bijections can be composed

set is Dedekind-finite if it is not Dedekind-infinite (i.e., no such bijection exists). Proposed by Dedekind in 1888, Dedekind-infiniteness was the first

other sets that are easier to count. Additionally, the nature of the bijection itself often provides powerful insights into each or both of the sets

(for example in French, the inverse function is preferably called the bijection réciproque). In the real numbers, zero does not have a reciprocal (division

compact Lie group K {\displaystyle K} . The theorem states that there is a bijection λ ↦ [ V λ ] {\displaystyle \lambda \mapsto [V^{\lambda }]} from the set

based maps from X to K ( G , n ) {\displaystyle K(G,n)} is in natural bijection with the n-th singular cohomology group H n ( X , G ) {\displaystyle H^{n}(X

correspondence (a bijection) between F {\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}} and G {\displaystyle {\mathcal {G}}} . In other words, that bijections are the "correct"

bigger than 1. However, there exists a Gray isometry (weight-preserving bijection) between Z 4 {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} _{4}} with the Lee weight and

e. ordinal) not less than or equal to the cardinality of X (with the bijection definition of cardinality and the injective function order). (If we restrict

path p : [ 0 , 1 ] → X {\displaystyle p:[0,1]\to X} in X determines a bijection F p ( 0 ) → ∼ F p ( 1 ) . {\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}_{p(0)}{\overset

existence theorem states that the reciprocity map can be used to give a bijection between the set of abelian extensions of F and the set of closed subgroups

attribute the judgements on coreference with respect to weak crossover to the Bijection Principle: “There is a bijective correspondence between variables and

e. ordinal) not less than or equal to the cardinality of X (with the bijection definition of cardinality and the injective function order). (If we restrict

follows: If G and H are two graphs on at least three vertices and ƒ is a bijection from V(G) to V(H) such that G\{v} and H\{ƒ(v)} are isomorphic for all

\{A\mid A\subseteq \kappa \land \kappa \in j(A)\}} , which defines a bijection between elementary embeddings and ultrafilters. Generally, there will

this does not work since the constructed bijection need not be computable. Instead, we build the bijection by successively pairing elements. At each

{\displaystyle \mu } are called computably isomorphic if there exists a computable bijection f {\displaystyle f} so that ν = μ ∘ f {\displaystyle \nu =\mu \circ f}

skew lattice is categorical if nonempty composites of coset bijections are coset bijections. Categorical skew lattices form a variety. Skew lattices in

τr) is not a Lie group. While the map exp : h → (H, τr) is an analytic bijection, its inverse is not continuous. That is, if U ⊂ h corresponds to a small

K − λ : X → X is a bijection ⇔ (K − λ) (L + μ0) = Id − λ (L + μ0) : dom(L) → X is a bijection ⇔ L + μ0 − λ−1 : dom(L) → X is a bijection. Replacing -μ0+λ−1

_{{p_{i}}^{m_{i}}}.} This expression is essentially unique: there is a bijection between the sets of groups in two such expressions, which maps each group

Taira Honda (1968) showed that this map is surjective, and therefore a bijection. Honda, Taira (1968), "Isogeny classes of abelian varieties over finite

classes of Legendrian knots modulo negative Legendrian stabilizations is in bijection with the set of transverse knots. Geiges, Hansjörg (2008). An introduction

bijection between the set of strongly continuous unitary representations of G and non-degenerate bounded *-representations of Cc(G). This bijection respects

Baire space; in fact every Polish space is the image of a continuous bijection defined on a closed subset of Baire space. Similarly, every compact Polish

demonstrated by a counter-example. In fact, the example violates the bijection, i.e. determinacy, property in the probability sum theorem. When the integrand

({\sqrt {-d}})}(2)\ .} The set of cusps of M d {\displaystyle M_{d}} is in bijection with the class group of Q ( − d ) {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} ({\sqrt {-d}})}

there is a natural bijection G ( U ) ≃ Hom ⁡ ( h U , G ) {\displaystyle G(U)\simeq \operatorname {Hom} (h_{U},G)} . Under this bijection, α U , x {\displaystyle

n × p matrix B. Sylver coinage, a number-theoretic game. Sylvester's bijection, a correspondence between partitions into distinct and odd parts. Sylvester

there is a natural bijection G ( U ) ≃ Hom ⁡ ( h U , G ) {\displaystyle G(U)\simeq \operatorname {Hom} (h_{U},G)} . Under this bijection, α U , x {\displaystyle

P_{E}} are in bijection with index 2 {\displaystyle 2} subgroups of π 1 ( P E ) {\displaystyle \pi _{1}(P_{E})} , which is in bijection with the set of

of F ( A ) {\displaystyle F(A)} ; rather intuitively, there exists a bijection between H o m ( H o m ( A , − ) , F ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {Hom} (\mathrm

Theory. Blackwell. Koopman, H., & Sportiche, D. (1982). Variables and the Bijection Principle. The Linguistic Review, 2, 139-60. Cinque, Guglielmo (1991)

construction, the left ideals of Mn(C) are in bijection with the subspaces of Cn. There is a bijection between the two-sided ideals of Mn(R) and the two-sided

this gives us a bijection between states of A {\displaystyle A} and the states of the canonical acceptor. It is clear that this bijection also preserves

the second lemma. ◻ {\displaystyle \square } In general, a continuous bijection between topological spaces is not necessarily a homeomorphism. The open

\mathrm {Spec} (R).} If R is an Artinian ring, then this map becomes a bijection. Matlis' Theorem: For a commutative Noetherian ring R, the map from the

adjointable, for 1 ≤ k ≤ n − 1 {\displaystyle 1\leq k\leq n-1} , there is a bijection between the C {\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}} -valued symmetric monoidal

for which these two subsets have the same cardinality, i.e., there is a bijection between them. This class is not elementary, because a σ-structure in which

cardinality as H because x ↦ a x {\displaystyle x\mapsto ax} defines a bijection H → a H {\displaystyle H\to aH} (the inverse is y ↦ a − 1 y {\displaystyle

extension in C and Y→X is some morphism in C. H2: The map in H1 is a bijection whenever Z→X is the small extension k[x]/(x2)→k. H3: The tangent space

{\mathcal {M}}} represented by M {\displaystyle {M}} , then we obtain a bijection between facets of Z {\displaystyle Z} and signed cocircuits of M {\displaystyle

extension in C and Y→X is some morphism in C. H2: The map in H1 is a bijection whenever Z→X is the small extension k[x]/(x2)→k. H3: The tangent space

p, there is a bijection between roots of unity in K and complex roots of unity of order coprime to p. Once a choice of such a bijection is fixed, the

This mapping determined by the frame ƒ is a bijection from the points of X to those of Σ. This bijection is compatible with the law of composition of

incorporates identity management features. Seam 2 introduces the concept of bijection, taken from Spring's dependency injection feature, where objects can be

\log((n/w)^{w})=w\log(n/w)=s} bits of data to encode these regular words. We fix a bijection from the set of bit strings of length s {\displaystyle s} to the set of

functor from Top to Set is not conservative because not every continuous bijection is a homeomorphism. Every faithful functor from a balanced category is

(4.822\pm 0.028)\times 10^{44}} , based on an efficiently computable bijection between integers and chess positions. As a comparison to the Shannon number

measure to the interval [0, 2π) and let f : [0, 2π) → S1 be the natural bijection defined by f(t) = exp(i t). The natural "Lebesgue measure" on S1 is then

numerator closures of rational tangles. This definition can be used to give a bijection between the set of 2-bridge links and the set of rational numbers; the

GK. For example, via rK the continuous complex characters of WK are in bijection with those of CK. Thus, the absolute value character on CK yields a character

sets and bijections between them, in which the monoidal product is disjoint union. One can show that for any finite sets, X,Y,U and bijection X + U ≅ Y

octahedron, the dodecahedron is dual to icosahedron. There is a natural bijection between the k {\displaystyle k} -dimensional faces of a d {\displaystyle

\sigma (x)-x} are permutations (in the mathematical sense, that is, a bijection – not a permutation box). Since there are no orthomorphisms for bit blocks

n=1} . Suppose then that n > 1 {\displaystyle n>1} . Then there is a bijection between the factors d {\displaystyle d} of n {\displaystyle n} for which

the inner condition b is a basis, when ϱ {\displaystyle \varrho } is a bijection from E onto the set of all m, namely for each m there is one and only

The inverse of any antilinear (resp. linear) bijection is again an antilinear (resp. linear) bijection. The composition of two antilinear maps is a linear

}:A\to (A\Rightarrow \bot )\Rightarrow \bot } defined as the image by the bijection defining the monoidal closure H o m ( ( A ⇒ ⊥ ) ⊗ A , ⊥ ) ≅ H o m ( A

that exp is a bi-analytic bijection in a neighborhood of 0 ∈ g in matrix space. Furthermore, exp, is a bi-analytic bijection from a neighborhood of 0 ∈

pullback of t along f: X → Ω is a monic. The monics to X are therefore in bijection with the pullbacks of t along morphisms from X to Ω. The latter morphisms

In the non-equivariant case, the first Chern class can be viewed as a bijection between the set of all isomorphism classes of complex line bundles on

}:A\to (A\Rightarrow \bot )\Rightarrow \bot } defined as the image by the bijection defining the monoidal closure H o m ( ( A ⇒ ⊥ ) ⊗ A , ⊥ ) ≅ H o m ( A

ϕ : M → A ∖ { 0 } {\displaystyle \phi :M\to A\setminus \{0\}} be the bijection m ↦ 1 ∗ m {\displaystyle m\mapsto 1\ast m} . Then we define addition on

group ring construction). Explicitly this means that there is a natural bijection between the set of the ring homomorphisms Z [ t , t − 1 ] → R {\displaystyle

algebraic group G, the set of conjugacy classes of parabolic subgroups is in bijection with the set of all subsets of nodes of the corresponding Dynkin diagram;

f : C → C {\displaystyle f:C\to C} is an isomorphism, that is it is a bijection of vertices of C {\displaystyle C} . A core of a graph G {\displaystyle

holds below κ {\displaystyle \kappa } then it holds everywhere because a bijection between the powerset of ν {\displaystyle \nu } and a cardinal at least

{\displaystyle L_{0}\left(x+\ker L\right):=L(x)} defines a bijection called the canonical bijection associated with L. X* or X ′ {\displaystyle X'} will denote

} If f {\displaystyle f} is a homeomorphism (that is, a bicontinuous bijection), then the α {\displaystyle \alpha } -limit set is defined in a similar

all partitions of n {\displaystyle n} . All that remains is to give a bijection from one set to the other, which is accomplished by the function φ from

separable. The problem that one encounters in the infinite case is that the bijection in the fundamental theorem does not hold as we get too many subgroups

many petals is similar to the Hawaiian earring: there is a continuous bijection from this rose onto the Hawaiian earring, but the two are not homeomorphic

at each step there are never more preceding D's than U's. These are in bijection with the Young tableaux of shape λ = ( n , n ) {\displaystyle \lambda

because the reflection process is reversible, the reflection is therefore a bijection between bad paths in the original grid and monotonic paths in the new

{\displaystyle {\tilde {f}}_{\bullet }\colon X\to Y^{I}} are in natural bijection with expressions as maps f ~ ∙ : X × I → Y {\displaystyle {\tilde {f}}_{\bullet

ISBN 0-387-97926-3. MR 1224675. Cao Labora, Daniel (2020). "When is a continuous bijection a homeomorphism?". Amer. Math. Monthly. 127 (6): 547–553. doi:10.1080/00029890

projections. Using spinor index notation, the Penrose transform gives a bijection between solutions to the spin ± n / 2 {\displaystyle \pm n/2} massless

correspondence between affine algebraic sets and radical ideals is a bijection. The coordinate ring of an affine algebraic set is reduced (nilpotent-free)

normed spaces, they are isomorphic normed spaces if there exists a linear bijection T : X → Y {\displaystyle T:X\to Y} such that T {\displaystyle T} and its

}\oplus \operatorname {Ker} (T).} The restriction T : Ker(T)⊥ → Ran(T) is a bijection, and therefore invertible by the open mapping theorem. Extend this inverse

same way. Instead, they are related by the following recursively defined bijection: the Dyck word equal to the empty string corresponds to the binary tree

{\displaystyle \mathbf {c} \mapsto {\mathfrak {S}}[\mathbf {c} ]} is a bijection, whose inverse is given by the assignment C : κ ↦ c κ {\displaystyle {\mathfrak

models is consistent if and only if it is related by the consistency bijection. Both models contain the same information, but presented differently.

{\displaystyle f^{-1}} are Riemann integrable and the identity follows from a bijection between lower/upper Darboux sums of f {\displaystyle f} and upper/lower

sequence that contains each rational number exactly once. This establishes a bijection between the rational numbers and the natural numbers, which maps each

{\textstyle \sum _{x\in X}f(x)} only in the case where there exists some bijection g : Z + → X {\displaystyle g:\mathbb {Z} ^{+}\to X} such that ∑ n = 1

}} is a finite subset of X ∗ {\displaystyle X_{\ast }} and there is a bijection from Φ {\displaystyle \Phi } onto Φ ∨ {\displaystyle \Phi ^{\vee }} ,

case where X is a projective variety, holomorphic line bundles are in bijection with linear equivalences class of divisors, and given a divisor D on X

0 : { 0 } → A 1 {\displaystyle i_{0}:\{0\}\to \mathbb {A} ^{1}} is a bijection. Here we are considering A 1 {\displaystyle \mathbb {A} ^{1}} as a sheaf

assign to each suitable subset a number cardinality (equal if there is a bijection), of a set is a measure of the "number of elements of the set" for well-ordered

the Robinson–Schensted–Knuth correspondence are examples of such bijections. A bijection with more structure is a proof using so called crystals. This method

{\displaystyle X\to K(A,j)} . More precisely, pulling back the class u gives a bijection [ X , K ( A , j ) ] → ≅ H j ( X , A ) {\displaystyle [X,K(A,j)]{\stackrel

universal bundle in the sense: for each compact space X, there is a natural bijection { [ X , G n ] → Vect n R ⁡ ( X ) f ↦ f ∗ ( γ n ) {\displaystyle {\begin{cases}[X

{Hom} _{\mathcal {D}}(FX,Y)\to \mathrm {Hom} _{\mathcal {C}}(X,GY)} is a bijection for all X and Y. The dual statements are also true. Let F : C → D be a

having the same highest weight are equivalent. In short, there exists a bijection between h ∗ {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {h}}^{*}} and the set of the equivalence

stated as follows: for any scheme X and a ring A, there is a natural bijection: Mor ⁡ ( X , Spec ⁡ ( A ) ) ≅ Hom ⁡ ( A , Γ ( X , O X ) ) . {\displaystyle

functions X → { 0 , 1 } {\displaystyle X\to \{0,1\}} are not automatically in bijection with all the subsets of X {\displaystyle X} . So constructively, subsets

_{fRep}:fRep\to \mathbb {R} /R\mathbb {Z} ,\;(x,f)\mapsto d(x)+f} is a bijection and that ( x , 0 ) ∈ f R e p {\displaystyle (x,0)\in fRep} for every x

C*-subalgebra. In fact, L* ∩ L is hereditary and the map L ↦ L* ∩ L is a bijection. It follows from this correspondence that every closed ideal is a hereditary

f} (the first isomorphism theorem). In fact, this correspondence is a bijection between the set of all quotient groups of G , G / N , {\displaystyle G

connected components of the fiber f − 1 ( s ) {\displaystyle f^{-1}(s)} is in bijection with the set of points in the fiber g − 1 ( s ) {\displaystyle g^{-1}(s)}

the case where A {\displaystyle A} has an identity element, there is a bijection between Φ A {\displaystyle \Phi _{A}} and the set of maximal ideals in

_{i\leq k}2^{a_{i}}} (Ershov 1999:477). This numbering is a (partial) bijection. A fixed Gödel numbering φ i {\displaystyle \varphi _{i}} of the computable

given a finite Galois extension K / k {\displaystyle K/k} , there is a bijection between the set of subfields k ⊂ E ⊂ K {\displaystyle k\subset E\subset

functor is a left adjoint to the faithful functor U; that is, there is a bijection Hom S e t ⁡ ( X , U ( B ) ) ≅ Hom C ⁡ ( F ( X ) , B ) . {\displaystyle

over the opposite skewfield Ko. There is thus an inclusion-reversing bijection between the projective spaces PG(n, K) and PG(n, Ko). If K and Ko are

field, and it follows from the Gelfand–Mazur theorem that there is a bijection between the set of all maximal ideals of A {\displaystyle A} and the set

set of natural numbers since the rationals are countable: there is a bijection from the naturals to the rationals. List of paradoxes – List of statements

X), F) → Hom(S, F), induced by the inclusion of S into Hom(−, X), is a bijection. Halfway in between a presheaf and a sheaf is the notion of a separated

{\displaystyle A\mapsto (B\Rightarrow A).} This means that there exists a bijection, called 'currying', between the Hom-sets Hom C ( A ⊗ B , C ) ≅ Hom C (

the complex plane is "biholomorphically equivalent" (i.e. there is a bijection between them that is holomorphic with a holomorphic inverse) to either

maximal preorderings. Let F {\displaystyle F} be a field. There is a bijection between the field orderings of F {\displaystyle F} and the positive cones

function as a polynomial: any injection of a finite set to itself is a bijection. When F {\displaystyle F} is the algebraic closure of a finite field,

{\displaystyle A\mapsto (B\Rightarrow A).} This means that there exists a bijection, called 'currying', between the Hom-sets Hom C ( A ⊗ B , C ) ≅ Hom C (

{\displaystyle S} is bijective with [ 0 , 1 ] , {\displaystyle [0,1],} and the bijection is measurable in both directions. By definition, the measurability of

product in M. We say that L is a rational cross-section if φ induces a bijection between L and M. We say that (A,L) is a rational structure for M if in

algebra g {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} , parabolic subalgebras are in bijection with subsets of simple roots, i.e. subsets of the nodes of the Dynkin

The bijection between points on the real line and vectors

obtains an (unnatural) bijection N ( X ) ≅ [ X , G / O ] . {\displaystyle {\mathcal {N}}(X)\cong [X,G/O].} The above bijection gives N ( X ) {\displaystyle

transformation T : A → A {\displaystyle T\colon A\to A} that restricts to a bijection C → C {\displaystyle C\to C} and satisfies T ( a ) = b {\displaystyle

complete totally ordered set isomorphic to the reals. *275 correlator bijection couple 1.  A cardinal couple is a class with exactly two elements 2.  An

lattice of G. The highest weight theory can be restated in the form of a bijection between the set of integral coadjoint orbits and the set of equivalence

1016/S0001-8708(02)00038-5. Lam, Thomas; Shimozono, Mark (2006). "A Little Bijection for Affine Stanley Symmetric Functions" (PDF). Séminaire Lotharingien

b ∈ R {\displaystyle a,b\in \mathbb {R} } . We therefore define the bijection f : R 2 → C ( a , b ) ↦ a + b i {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}f\colon

correspondence for GLn over K (now proved) states that there is a natural bijection between isomorphism classes of irreducible admissible representations

= g(aH). Moreover, since H is a group, left multiplication by a is a bijection, and aH = H. Thus every element of G belongs to exactly one left coset

variables whose restriction to N 2 {\displaystyle \mathbb {N} ^{2}} is a bijection from N 2 {\displaystyle \mathbb {N} ^{2}} to N {\displaystyle \mathbb

{R}}({\widetilde {G}}\cdot {\widetilde {H}},\omega _{\psi })} is the graph of a bijection between R ( G ~ , ω ψ ) {\displaystyle {\mathcal {R}}({\widetilde {G}}

{\displaystyle \alpha _{i}=f^{*}(u_{i})\in L.} For each L, the construction is a bijection between the set of L-points of P ˘ k n {\displaystyle {\breve {\mathbb

"plain" to "compressed" bit sequences. The pigeonhole principle prohibits a bijection between the collection of sequences of length N and any subset of the

{R}}({\widetilde {G}}\cdot {\widetilde {H}},\omega _{\psi })} is the graph of a bijection between R ( G ~ , ω ψ ) {\displaystyle {\mathcal {R}}({\widetilde {G}}

{\displaystyle ^{L}{\mathfrak {g}}} as the Langlands dual algebra, there is a bijection between the spectrum of the Gaudin algebra generated by operators defined

topology of X (that is, the family of all open sets). Then we have a bijection from T ( X ) {\displaystyle T(X)} to C ( X , S ) {\displaystyle C(X,S)}

{\overline {X}}^{\prime }.} This says exactly that the canonical antilinear bijection defined by Cong ⁡   :   X ′ → X ¯ ′  where  Cong ⁡ ( f ) := f ¯ {\displaystyle

{\displaystyle 1\in \mathbf {Z} /p,} which shows that this map is a bijection. As a consequence, the number of normal subgroups of index p is ( p k

{\displaystyle S_{n}^{\wedge }} of irreducible representations is in natural bijection with the set of integer partitions of n {\displaystyle n} . For an irreducible

certain combinatorial objects called pipe dreams or rc-graphs. These are in bijection with reduced Kogan faces, (introduced in the PhD thesis of Mikhail Kogan)

These requirements are put into a priority ordering, which is an explicit bijection of the requirements and the natural numbers. The proof proceeds inductively

the mapping ⁠ φ t : X → X {\displaystyle \varphi ^{t}:X\to X} ⁠ is a bijection with inverse ⁠ φ − t : X → X . {\displaystyle \varphi ^{-t}:X\to X.} ⁠

to a canonical bijection, as for each i ∈ I , A i ≅ π − 1 ( { i } ) {\displaystyle i\in I,A_{i}\cong \pi ^{-1}(\{i\})} via the bijection a ↦ ( i , a )

disjoint open sets U and V in X such that A ⊆ U and B ⊆ V. A continuous bijection from a compact space into a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism. A compact

some prime not equal to p. Lafforgue's theorem states that there is a bijection σ between: Equivalence classes of cuspidal representations π of GLn(F)

this structure, a map is a coarse equivalence if and only if it is a bijection (of sets). The C 0 {\displaystyle C_{0}} coarse structure on a metric

arbitrary partition with at most n parts. This gives a weight-preserving bijection between the set of partitions into n or n − 1 distinct parts and the set

coarse moduli requires a universality.) In other words, there is a natural bijection between the set of all open immersions to F and the set of all open subsets

( X ∖ U ) {\displaystyle X=U\,\cup \,(X\setminus U)} then the linear bijection H : ∏ x ∈ X K → ( ∏ u ∈ U K ) × ∏ x ∈ X ∖ U K ( f x ) x ∈ X ↦ ( ( f u

is recursively isomorphic to K, that is, there is a total computable bijection f on the natural numbers such that f(C) = K. The set of all provable sentences

is the dual lie algebra, hence G {\displaystyle G} -connections are in bijection with C ∞ ( H , g ∗ ⊗ g ) G {\displaystyle C^{\infty }(H,{\mathfrak {g}}^{*}\otimes

{\displaystyle \phi _{i,x}:E_{x}\to \mathbb {R} ^{k}} . This data determines a bijection ψ i : π − 1 ( U i ) → U i × G L ( k , R ) {\displaystyle \psi _{i}:\pi

big figure to a subset of the A points in it, we can make a mapping (a bijection) from the big figure to all the A points in it. (In some regions points

algebraically closed field k, mSpec (k[T1, ..., Tn] / (f1, ..., fm)) is in bijection with the set {x =(x1, ..., xn) ∊ kn Thus, maximal ideals reflect the geometric

H o m ( V , − ) {\displaystyle \mathrm {Hom} (V,-)} , given a natural bijection H o m ( U ⊗ V , W ) ≅ H o m ( U , H o m ( V , W ) ) . {\displaystyle \mathrm

invariant component D A conjugate of an element h of H by a conformal bijection is parabolic or elliptic if and only if h is. Any parabolic element of

{\displaystyle (m,n)\mapsto (m,n){\begin{pmatrix}d&c\\b&a\end{pmatrix}}} is a bijection Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } 2 → Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } 2, i

{\displaystyle P(x')=y'} . Since P {\displaystyle P} is not necessary a bijection, one may find more than one solution to this inversion (there exist at

Pinter (2006) Ackerman, Eyal; Barequet, Gill; Pinter, Ron Y. (2006), "A bijection between permutations and floorplans, and its applications", Discrete Applied

immediately obvious from the definition but can be shown by establishing a bijection between the sets of semistandard Young tableaux of shape λ {\displaystyle

convenient to encode string diagrams as formulae in generic form, which are in bijection with the labeled generic progressive plane graphs defined above. Fix a

{B}})\subseteq {\mathcal {C}}.} If in addition f {\displaystyle f} is a bijection and f − 1 {\displaystyle f^{-1}} is also bounded then f {\displaystyle

by the partitions of n. The Springer correspondence in this case is a bijection, and in the standard parametrizations, it is given by transposition of

identity map X → Y {\displaystyle X\to Y} is then a continuous, linear bijection but its inverse is not continuous, since X {\displaystyle X} has a finer

a_{v}:s(v)\rightarrow A(H)} of a {\displaystyle a} on s ( v ) {\displaystyle s(v)} is a bijection, with s ( v ) {\displaystyle s(v)} the set of successor nodes of v {\displaystyle

{\displaystyle L} and let φ : F → B {\displaystyle \varphi :F\to B} be a bijection. Then there is a linear transformation T : K → L {\displaystyle T:K\to

{B}}\right)\subseteq {\mathcal {C}}.} If in addition f {\displaystyle f} is a bijection and f − 1 {\displaystyle f^{-1}} is also bounded then f {\displaystyle

G / N ≅ G ′ / N ′ {\displaystyle G/N\cong G'/N'} . One then obtains a bijection between: Subgroups of G × G ′ {\displaystyle G\times G'} which project

left/mid); yet, both aren't similar. The Schröder-Bernstein theorem applied to the unstructured pixel sets obtains a non-continuous bijection (right).

trivialization over DR. Then the maps in the above diagram furnish a bijection between Triv(XR) and GLr(R((t))) (where R((t)) is the formal Laurent series

injective, then there exists an element b of B such that there exists a bijection between the preimage of b and A. This is a quite different statement,

Technology. Ackerman, Eyal; Barequet, Gill; Pinter, Ron Y. (2006), "A bijection between permutations and floorplans, and its applications", Discrete Applied

generalize the linear extensions of P {\displaystyle P} , the order-preserving bijections ϕ : P ⟶ ∼ [ p ] {\displaystyle \phi :P{\stackrel {\sim }{\longrightarrow

by the partitions of n. The Springer correspondence in this case is a bijection, and in the standard parametrizations, it is given by transposition of

nonsingular projective variety, the set | D | {\displaystyle |D|} is in natural bijection with ( Γ ( X , L ) ∖ { 0 } ) / k ∗ , {\displaystyle (\Gamma (X,{\mathcal

{\mathbb {R} }/{\mathbb {Z} }} The doubling map on the circle gives a bijection from A j {\displaystyle A_{j}} to A j + 1 {\displaystyle A_{j+1}} and

logic; a translation is faithful if there exists a mapping (typically, a bijection) between the extensions (or models) of the original and translated theories;

automorphism of a pregeometry ( S , cl ) {\displaystyle (S,{\text{cl}})} is a bijection σ : S → S {\displaystyle \sigma :S\to S} such that σ ( cl ( X ) ) = cl

reconstructing the sequence B,F,A,G,D,E,C. The Lehmer code defines a bijection from the symmetric group Sn to the Cartesian product [ n ] × [ n − 1 ]

smaller limit ordinals, then one can create an explicit constructive bijection between ω and α, (i.e. one not using the axiom of choice). Here we will

an n-dimensional vector space X, the dual basis construction gives a bijection between bases for X and bases for the dual space X ∗ , {\displaystyle

= κ + {\displaystyle 2^{\kappa }=\kappa ^{+}\,} . Then there exists a bijection σ : κ + → P ( κ ) {\displaystyle \sigma :\kappa ^{+}\to {\mathcal {P}}(\kappa

{\displaystyle m} . The above inequality becomes an equality if the transform is a bijection. Furthermore, when m {\displaystyle m} is a rigid rotation, translation

has range R > 0 {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} _{>0}} . Therefore, f is a bijection from R {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } to R > 0 {\displaystyle \mathbb {R}

x t ↔ ( t , x t ) {\displaystyle x_{t}\leftrightarrow (t,x_{t})} is a bijection between the sets of integral curves of X {\displaystyle X} and X ~ , {\displaystyle

generators of degree 4k for positive integers k, implies that this gives a bijection between formal power series Q with rational coefficients and leading coefficient

basis-exchange property. Bijective basis-exchange property: There is a bijection f {\displaystyle f} from A {\displaystyle A} to B {\displaystyle B} ,

{\vec {a}}\cdot {\vec {\sigma }}} , making it manifest that the map is a bijection. The norm is given by the determinant (up to a minus sign) det ( a → ⋅

the plane which are of finite type. More precisely there is an explicit bijection between CMC immersions of R 2 {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}} into R

Currying). Because curry {\displaystyle \operatorname {curry} } is a bijection, semigroup actions can be defined as functions S → ( X → X ) {\displaystyle

be assigned to exactly one point in the unit n-sphere by a continuous bijection with continuous inverse. For example, a point x on an n-sphere of radius

only if the deficiency indices are both zero. We see that there is a bijection between symmetric extensions of an operator and isometric extensions of

points and lines to lines that preserves incidence, meaning that if σ is a bijection and point P is on line m, then Pσ is on mσ. If σ is a collineation of

such that either one is completely determined by the other (i.e. by a bijection); where μ {\displaystyle \mu } is a signed measure over these sets, and

nullspace E 1 {\displaystyle E_{1}} . The first identity comes from the bijection which takes V ⊂ F q m {\displaystyle V\subset \mathbb {F} _{q}^{m}} to

polynomial ring means that F and POL are adjoint functors. That is, there is a bijection Hom S E T ⁡ ( X , F ⁡ ( A ) ) ≅ Hom A L G ⁡ ( K [ X ] , A ) . {\displaystyle

manifold. Automorphisms play a crucial role in the study of smooth planes. A bijection of the point set of a projective plane is called a collineation, if it