7 results back to index
To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science by Steven Weinberg
Albert Einstein, Alfred Russel Wallace, Astronomia nova, Brownian motion, Commentariolus, cosmological constant, dark matter, Dava Sobel, double helix, Edmond Halley, Eratosthenes, Ernest Rutherford, fudge factor, invention of movable type, Isaac Newton, James Watt: steam engine, music of the spheres, On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, probability theory / Blaise Pascal / Pierre de Fermat, retrograde motion, Thomas Kuhn: the structure of scientific revolutions
In 1510 he settled in Frombork, where he constructed a small observatory, and where he remained until his death in 1543. Soon after he came to Frombork, Copernicus wrote a short anonymous work, later titled De hypothesibus motuum coelestium a se constitutis commentariolus, and generally known as the Commentariolus, or Little Commentary.1 The Commentariolus was not published until long after its author’s death, and so was not as influential as his later writings, but it gives a good account of the ideas that guided his work. After a brief criticism of earlier theories of the planets, Copernicus in the Commentariolus states seven principles of his new theory. Here is a paraphrase, with some added comments: 1. There is no one center of the orbits of the celestial bodies. (There is disagreement among historians whether Copernicus thought that these bodies are carried on material spheres,2 as supposed by Aristotle.) 2.
(Presumably Copernicus made this assumption to explain why we do not see annual parallax, the apparent annual motion of the stars caused by the Earth’s motion around the Sun. But the problem of parallax is nowhere mentioned in the Commentariolus.) 5. The apparent daily motion of the stars around the Earth arises entirely from the Earth’s rotation on its axis. 6. The apparent motion of the Sun arises jointly from the rotation of the Earth on its axis and the Earth’s revolution (like that of the other planets) around the Sun. 7. The apparent retrograde motion of the planets arises from the Earth’s motion, occurring when the Earth passes Mars, Jupiter, or Saturn, or is passed in its orbit by Mercury or Venus. Copernicus could not claim in the Commentariolus that his scheme fitted observation better than that of Ptolemy. For one thing, it didn’t. Indeed, it couldn’t, since for the most part Copernicus based his theory on data he inferred from Ptolemy’s Almagest, rather than on his own observations.3 Instead of appealing to new observations, Copernicus pointed out a number of his theory’s aesthetic advantages.
He then described his conclusion: Having thus assumed the motions which I ascribe to the Earth later in the volume, by long and intense study I finally found that if the motions of the other planets are correlated with the orbiting of the Earth, and are computed for the revolution of each planet, not only do their phenomena follow therefrom but also the order and size of all the planets and spheres, and heaven itself is so linked together that in no portion of it can anything be shifted without disrupting the remaining parts and the universe as a whole. As in the Commentariolus, Copernicus was appealing to the fact that his theory was more predictive than Ptolemy’s; it dictated a unique order of planets and the sizes of their orbits required to account for observation, while Ptolemy’s theory left these undetermined. Of course, Copernicus had no way of confirming that his orbital radii were correct without assuming the truth of his theory; this had to wait for Galileo’s observations of planetary phases. Most of De Revolutionibus is extremely technical, fleshing out the general ideas of the Commentariolus. One point worth special mention is that in Book 1 Copernicus states an a priori commitment to motion composed of circles. Thus Chapter 1 of Book I begins: First of all, we must note that the universe is spherical.
At the site of Ptolemy’s fabled observatory on the Nile, with its near-tropical climate, the planets climbed almost straight up from the horizon, instead of loitering along the tree line, and rode high in the sky, easily sighted through countless cloudless nights. Everything Copernicus knew about Ptolemy when he prepared the Commentariolus, he learned from an abridged interpretation of Ptolemy’s work, called the Epitome of Ptolemy’s Almagest, published in Venice in 1496. Now, as he launched his own serious research project to revise astronomy, the full text of Ptolemy’s Almagest became available for the first time in a printed Latin translation. Copernicus consumed his copy, covering its margins with notes and diagrams.1 Copernicus found in the Almagest a model for the book he wanted to write, in which he would rebuild astronomy in a framework as impressive and enduring as Ptolemy’s. Meanwhile the Commentariolus, his prequel to On the Revolutions, was already making his name as an astronomer. This growing recognition no doubt accounted for the invitation Copernicus received from Rome to consult on calendar reform.
The last of Theophylactus’s letters had touched on death and its lessons for the living. “Stroll through the tombstones,” it counseled those weighed down by their own sorrows. “You will behold man’s greatest joys as in the end they take on the lightness of dust.” Chapter 2 The Brief Sketch The center of the earth is not the center of the universe, but only the center towards which heavy things move and the center of the lunar sphere. —FROM THE Commentariolus, OR Brief Sketch, BY COPERNICUS, CA. 1510 In 1510, when Copernicus, at thirty-seven, assumed his position in residence as a canon of Varmia in Frauenburg, the Cathedral Chapter assigned him a house, or curia, outside the fortification walls, plus two servants and three horses as perquisites of office. The influential chapter governed the lives of its member canons, as well as the residents of hamlets for hundreds of miles around, not to mention the numerous peasants who worked the thousands of acres of Church-owned lands that yielded the canons’ livelihood.
No wonder the beauty of the system prevailed over the absurdity of the Earth’s motion. He hoped his own conviction would convince others to see the spheres his way, but offered no proofs at this point. He had decided, he said, “for the sake of brevity to leave the mathematical demonstrations out of this treatise, as they are intended for a larger book.” Then he proceeded to count and clarify all the individual planetary motions, arriving, in the final paragraph of the Commentariolus, at the grand total: “Mercury runs on seven circles in all; Venus on five; the earth on three, and round it the moon on four; finally Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn on five each. Altogether, therefore, thirty-four circles suffice to explain the entire structure of the universe and the entire ballet of the planets.” Copernicus surely anticipated ridicule from his contemporaries. If the Earth rotated and revolved at great speed, they could argue, then anything not nailed down would go flying.
Big Bang by Simon Singh
Albert Einstein, Albert Michelson, All science is either physics or stamp collecting, Andrew Wiles, anthropic principle, Arthur Eddington, Astronomia nova, Brownian motion, carbon-based life, Cepheid variable, Chance favours the prepared mind, Commentariolus, Copley Medal, cosmic abundance, cosmic microwave background, cosmological constant, cosmological principle, dark matter, Dava Sobel, Defenestration of Prague, discovery of penicillin, Dmitri Mendeleev, Edmond Halley, Edward Charles Pickering, Eratosthenes, Ernest Rutherford, Erwin Freundlich, Fellow of the Royal Society, fudge factor, Hans Lippershey, Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis, Harvard Computers: women astronomers, Henri Poincaré, horn antenna, if you see hoof prints, think horses—not zebras, Index librorum prohibitorum, invention of the telescope, Isaac Newton, John von Neumann, Karl Jansky, Louis Daguerre, Louis Pasteur, luminiferous ether, Magellanic Cloud, Murray Gell-Mann, music of the spheres, Olbers’ paradox, On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, Paul Erdős, retrograde motion, Richard Feynman, Richard Feynman, scientific mainstream, Simon Singh, Solar eclipse in 1919, Stephen Hawking, the scientific method, Thomas Kuhn: the structure of scientific revolutions, unbiased observer, V2 rocket, Wilhelm Olbers, William of Occam
After his uncle Lucas died in 1512 (having quite possibly been poisoned by the Teutonic Knights, who had described him as ‘the devil in human shape’), he had even more time to pursue his studies. He moved to Frauenburg Castle, set up a small observatory and concentrated on fleshing out his argument, adding in all the mathematical detail that was missing in the Commentariolus. Copernicus spent the next thirty years reworking his Commentariolus, expanding it into an authoritative two-hundred-page manuscript. Throughout this prolonged period of research, he spent a great deal of time worrying about how other astronomers would react to his model of the universe, which was fundamentally at odds with accepted wisdom. There were often days when he even considered abandoning plans to publish his work for fear that he would be mocked far and wide.
This amateur astronomer would grow increasingly obsessed with studying the motion of the planets, and his ideas would eventually make him one of the most important figures in the history of science. Surprisingly, all Copernicus’s astronomical research was contained in just 11/2 publications. Even more surprising, these 11/2 publications were hardly read during his lifetime. The 1/2 refers to his first work, the Commentariolus (‘Little Commentary’), which was handwritten, never formally published and circulated only among a few people in roughly 1514. Nevertheless, in just twenty pages Copernicus shook the cosmos with the most radical idea in astronomy for over one thousand years. At the heart of his pamphlet were the seven axioms upon which he based his view of the universe: 1. The heavenly bodies do not share a common centre. 2.
It is not clear what motivated Copernicus to formulate these axioms and break with the traditional world-view, but perhaps he was influenced by Domenico Maria de Novara, one of his professors in Italy. Novara was sympathetic to the Pythagorean tradition, which was at the root of Aristarchus’ philosophy, and it was Aristarchus who had first posited the Sun-centred model 1,700 years earlier. The Commentariolus was a manifesto for an astronomical mutiny, an expression of Copernicus’s frustration and disillusionment with the ugly complexity of the ancient Ptolemaic model. Later he would condemn the makeshift nature of the Earth-centred model: ‘It is as though an artist were to gather the hands, feet, head and other members for his images from diverse models, each part excellently drawn, but not related to a single body, and since they in no way match each other, the result would be a monster rather than a man.’
The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution by David Wootton
agricultural Revolution, Albert Einstein, British Empire, clockwork universe, Commentariolus, conceptual framework, Dava Sobel, double entry bookkeeping, double helix, en.wikipedia.org, Ernest Rutherford, Fellow of the Royal Society, fudge factor, germ theory of disease, Google X / Alphabet X, Hans Lippershey, interchangeable parts, invention of gunpowder, invention of the steam engine, invention of the telescope, Isaac Newton, Jacques de Vaucanson, James Watt: steam engine, John Harrison: Longitude, knowledge economy, lone genius, Mercator projection, On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, placebo effect, QWERTY keyboard, Republic of Letters, spice trade, spinning jenny, the scientific method, Thomas Kuhn: the structure of scientific revolutions
Thus Copernicus argued for a spherical Earth – appealing to the evidence of the shape of the Earth’s shadow cast on the moon during eclipses to confirm that the Earth was to all intents and purposes a perfect sphere, the occasional mountain and valley notwithstanding – a crucial first step towards arguing that the Earth rotates on a north–south axis. By 1543 the broad outline of Copernicus’s argument for the Earth as a single globe was conventional. But we know that Copernicus had first formulated his views by 1514, for at that date at least one copy of his preliminary sketch, the Commentariolus, or Little Commentary, was in existence.49 He gives us two accounts of the development of his thinking, one at the beginning of the Little Commentary and the other at the beginning of On the Revolutions. From them we learn that he had long been dissatisfied with conventional astronomical theories, that he had engaged in a systematic programme of reading in an attempt to identify alternatives, that the idea that the Earth moved had at first seemed to him absurd but that he had persisted with it, determined to see if it could provide the basis for a new account of the movements of the heavens.
British Journal for the History of Science 27 (1994): 55–64. Sutton, Robert B. ‘The Phrase Libertas philosophandi’. Journal of the History of Ideas 14 (1953): 310–16. Swerdlow, Noel M. ‘Copernicus and Astrology, with an Appendix of Translations of Primary Sources’. Perspectives on Science 20 (2012): 353–78. ———. ‘The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus’s Planetary Theory: A Translation of the Commentariolus with Commentary’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 117 (1973): 423–512. ———. ‘An Essay on Thomas Kuhn’s First Scientific Revolution: The Copernican Revolution’. American Philosophical Society Proceedings 141 (2004): 64–120. ———. ‘Montucla’s Legacy: The History of the Exact Sciences’. Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (1993): 299–328. ———. ‘Urania propitia, tabulae rudophinae faciles redditae a Maria Cunitia [Beneficent Urania, the Adaptation of the Rudolphine Tables by Maria Cunitz]’.
G. 431–2, 436, 446 Collins, Anthony 468, 473 Collins, Harry 582–3, 584, 589–90 Colombo, Realdo 86, 96 colour see light, Newton’s theory of Columbus, Christopher 57–60 accepted all across Europe 62, 104 age of discovery? 65 Bacon’s model 91 conceptions of the Earth 111 discovery claims of 87–8, 89 Galileo and 91–2 important book regarding 76 legacy of 535 Mersenne on 81 naming places 98 prior reward for discovery 106 Ptolemy and 121, 184 rejecting the ancients 73 social status 283 comets 191–3, 303, 619–20n59 ‘Comment on Grünbaum’s Claim, A’ (W. V. O. Quine) 514n Commentariolus (Nicolaus Copernicus) 137–8, 139, 142 common sense 529, 532, 533, 537, 543 Common Sense (Thomas Paine) 20 compasses 327–30 deviation and dip 481 discovery of America and 60 Greeks and Romans 62 magnets and 327–8 needles of 388 Compendium of Arithmetic, Geometry, Proportions and Proportionality, A (Luca Pacioli) 176 competition 92–3, 104, 108 Conan Doyle, Arthur 400 Conant, James Bryant 394, 544 Concerning the Recent Phenomena of the Aetherial World (Tycho Brahe) 193 Congo River 79 Consideratione (Giambattista Benedetti) 27 consistency 270n Constantinople 184, 186n, 187, 451 constraint 589–90 constructivism 516–17, 591 Contarini, Cardinal Gasparo 73 Continuation of New Experiments, A (Robert Boyle) 492, 503 Continuation of the New Digester, A (Denis Papin) 504–10 controversy and change 245–7 Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds (Bernard de Fontenelle) 231 Conversations with Galileo’s Starry Messenger (Johannes Kepler) 8–9, 302 Copernican Revolution, The (Thomas Kuhn) 18, 145, 246n, 516 Copernicus, Nicolaus 137–59 see also On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres acceptable margins of error for 262 altera orbis terrarium 132 background 137 Bacon dismisses 107 Bellarmine’s attitude to 388 Bruno and 146–9 Catholic condemnation of 104, 149, 197n, 214 conception of Earth 3n contemporary knowledge of 7 crater named after 102 Descartes and 362 difficulties implicit in theories 218 Digges and 149–51, 154–9 Earth as one spherical globe 138 Earth’s rotation described 139 Galileo and 45, 91–2, 233, 267, 358, 371, 395n Gilbert tries to justify 329 Greek forebears 78, 91 Gresham’s Law and 304 heliocentrism and geoheliocentrism 140 Hobbes on 39 hypotheses of 386 Kepler’s Rudolphine tables 307 Kuhn on 13n, 55, 562 laws of astronomy claim 370 mathematician, as 424 microcosm and macrocosm 244 monetary reform expertise 206n nature of the earth 525–6 opposition to 145 Ptolemy and 144–5, 152, 154, 246 reading material of 141–3 reflected light of planets 245 Sacrobosco and 229 spheres of earth and water 116 success of system, factors in 516 summary 137 three systems of the cosmos 97, 99 two spheres theory rejected 139 Tycho Brahe and 140, 193–5, 223, 226, 227 Venus and Earth 222 Vesalius and 183 copyright 101n Coriolanus (William Shakespeare) 5 corpuscular philosophy 433–4, 443, 446, 447, 460 Cortes, Hernan 38–9 Corvinus, Lawrence 139 Cosimo II (de’ Medici) 214 Cosmographiæ introductio, The (Martin Waldseemüller) 59n, 124 Cosmographic Book (Peter Apian) 201, 202 Cosmographic Mystery, The (Johannes Kepler) 212 Cotes, Roger 322, 375 Coulanges, Fustel de 550n Course of Experimental Philosophy, A (J.
Coming of Age in the Milky Way by Timothy Ferris
Albert Einstein, Albert Michelson, Alfred Russel Wallace, anthropic principle, Arthur Eddington, Atahualpa, Cepheid variable, Chance favours the prepared mind, Commentariolus, cosmic abundance, cosmic microwave background, cosmological constant, cosmological principle, dark matter, delayed gratification, Edmond Halley, Eratosthenes, Ernest Rutherford, Gary Taubes, Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis, Harvard Computers: women astronomers, Henri Poincaré, invention of writing, Isaac Newton, John Harrison: Longitude, Karl Jansky, Lao Tzu, Louis Pasteur, Magellanic Cloud, mandelbrot fractal, Menlo Park, Murray Gell-Mann, music of the spheres, planetary scale, retrograde motion, Richard Feynman, Richard Feynman, Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, Searching for Interstellar Communications, Solar eclipse in 1919, Stephen Hawking, Thomas Kuhn: the structure of scientific revolutions, Thomas Malthus, Wilhelm Olbers
Stocks translation, McKeon edition, 1968, p. 437. 16. See Heyerdahl, 1979. 17. In Morison, 1963, p. 62. 18. Ibid., p. 65. 19. In Heyerdahl, 1979, p. 147. 20. In Morison, 1963, p. 383. 21. In Mason, 1977, p. 243. 22. In MacCurdy, 1939, p. 276. CHAPTER FOUR: THE SUN WORSHIPERS 1. Copernicus, On the Revolutions, Duncan translation, preface. 2. In Panofsky, 1969, p. 10. 3. Copernicus, Commentariolus, in Rosen, 1959. 4. Copernicus, On the Revolutions, John Dobson and Selig Brodetsky, translators, Occasional Notes of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 2, No. 10, 1947, in Kuhn, 1979, p. 139. 5. Plutarch, Moralia, XII, p. 925; Cherniss and Helmbold translation, p. 75. 6. Nicole Oresme, “The Compatibility of the Earth’s Diurnal Rotation With Astronomical Phenomena and Terrestrial Physics,” in Grant, Edward, 1974, p. 505. 7.
Jerzy Dobrzycki and trans. Edward Rosen. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers, 1978; Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978. Large format, with a commentary by Rosen. —————. On the Revolutions, ed. and trans. A.M. Duncan. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1976. —————.On the Revolutions, trans. Charles Glenn Wallis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952. —————. Three Copernican Treatises: The Commentariolus of Copernicus, the Letter Against Werner, the Narratio Prima of Rheticus, ed. and trans. Edward Rosen. New York: Dover, 1959. Shorter works of Copernicus not previously translated into English. Cornell, James. The First Stargazers. New York: Scribner’s, 1981. Cornford, F.M. Plato’s Cosmology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977. Translation of the Timaeus, with running commentary. Cornwall, I.W.
Pathfinders: The Golden Age of Arabic Science by Jim Al-Khalili
agricultural Revolution, Albert Einstein, Andrew Wiles, Book of Ingenious Devices, colonial rule, Commentariolus, Dmitri Mendeleev, Eratosthenes, Henri Poincaré, invention of the printing press, invention of the telescope, invention of the wheel, Isaac Newton, Islamic Golden Age, Joseph Schumpeter, retrograde motion, Silicon Valley, Simon Singh, stem cell, Stephen Hawking, the scientific method, Thomas Malthus, trade route, William of Occam
Aydin Sayili, The Observatory in Islam and its Place in the General History of the Observatory, Publications of the Turkish Historical Society, 7/38 (Ayer Co. Pub., Ankara, 1988). 10. The term was coined by historian Edward Kennedy in his paper ‘Late Medieval Planetary Theory’, Isis, 57 (1966), pp. 365–78. 11. Noel Swerdlow, ‘The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus’ Planetary Theory: A Translation of the Commentariolus with Commentary’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 117 (1973), p. 426. 12. Willy Hartner, ‘Copernicus, the Man, the Work, and its History’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 117 (1973), pp. 413–22. 13. Swerdlow, ‘The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus’ Planetary Theory’, p. 423. 14. Stahl, ‘The Greek Heliocentric Theory and its Abandonment’, p. 322. 15.
clean water, Commentariolus, dumpster diving, Eratosthenes, financial innovation, invention of movable type, Islamic Golden Age, knowledge economy, means of production, Murano, Venice glass, paper trading, Ponzi scheme, wikimedia commons
Robert Proctor, The Printing of Greek in the Fifteenth Century (Oxford: The Bibliographical Society, 1900), 12–13; Stephan Füssel, “Bringing the Technical Inventions Together,” in Gutenberg and the Impact of Printing (Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2005), 15–18. 31. Davies, Aldus Manutius, 14–15. 32. Ibid., 20–26. 33. Ibid., 33–39; “Cornucopiae Linguae Latinae (Ed: Aldus Manutius). Add: Commentariolus in Prohemium Historiae Naturalis Plinii. Cornelius Vitellius: Epistola Parthenio Benacensi,” Incunabula Short Title Catalogue, British Library, accessed November 1, 2014, http://istc.bl.uk/search/search.html?operation=record&rsid=131906&q=0; “Hypnerotomachia Poliphili. Add: Leonardus Crassus, Johannes Baptista Scytha and Andreas Maro,” Incunabula Short Title Catalogue, British Library, accessed November 1, 2014, http://istc.bl.uk/search/search.html?